Advancements in digital dentistry are transforming the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses (crowns and bridges). This systematic review compares the time efficiency and cost factors between digital and conventional workflows, helping dental professionals make informed decisions.
Clinical Impact:
Time Savings: Digital workflows reduce laboratory processing time, though scanning and impression-making times vary depending on the technique.
Clinical Adjustments: No significant difference in chairside adjustments between digital and conventional methods.
Cost Analysis: While digital workflows show efficiency, no conclusive cost comparison is available, highlighting the need for further research.
Conclusion:
Digital technology streamlines prosthetic fabrication, offering potential benefits in efficiency and workflow optimization. However, additional studies are required to assess its cost-effectiveness
Reference :Bessadet, M., Drancourt, N., & El Osta, N. (2025). Time efficiency and cost analysis between digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 133(1), 71-84.
